- California Assembly OKs highest minimum wage in nation
- S. Korea unveils first graphic cigarette warnings
- US joins with South Korea, Japan in bid to deter North Korea
- LPGA golfer Chun In-gee finally back in action
- S. Korea won’t be top seed in final World Cup qualification round
- US men’s soccer misses 2nd straight Olympics
- US back on track in qualifying with 4-0 win over Guatemala
- High-intensity workout injuries spawn cottage industry
- CDC expands range of Zika mosquitoes into parts of Northeast
- Who knew? ‘The Walking Dead’ is helping families connect
Advancing at all costs, but at what expense?
Henrietta Lacks, a black woman, was diagnosed with cervical cancer in 1950. To her family, her death was a devastation; but to her doctor, nothing but a tool for success. After Lacks’ death at the Johns Hopkins Hospital in Baltimore, her doctor shared a sample of her tumors to a researcher in attempts to create an immortal cell line. This cell line — HeLa cell line — led to great success and became the foundation in developing polio vaccine, as well as other drugs that cure Parkinson’s disease and leukemia. As the doctors and researchers who profited from this cell line were hailed for their brilliance, Henrietta’s family were suffering in deep poverty. When Lacks’ children found out about the existence of their mother’s cells, they were shocked and discomforted, seeking a share of the profit or an informed consent for the use of their mother’s cells. However, they were scornfully denied and the exploitation of human cells only continued.
In John Moore’s case in 1980, Moore was alive to advocate for himself and his cells. Researchers removed Moore’s spleen as part of his leukemia treatment. Moore’s doctor recognized the financial and scientific potential of his particular cancerous cells and patented a cell line, which he licensed for hundreds of thousands of dollars. Even after Moore’s treatment was over, the doctor advised him to keep getting treatment in attempts to take samples. When Moore found out, he sued the doctors. This case moved all the way up to the Supreme Court, in which they favored with the doctors.
This brings up a serious moral and ethical issue. So, if I lose a piece of hair, is it still my hair? Can scientists use that piece of hair to do research? Probably. In that case, does everything in my body belong to doctors and researchers who want to perform research on it? Many cases have been filed against these individuals who have been wrongly exploited by the advancements of science. Is the advancement of science really worth all of these ethical and moral issues?
kelly
November 26, 2017 at 5:36 PM
yes..I like the basic concepts behind Second Life but it seems incredibly outdated and when I played it was intensely non-intuitive / user friendly to an extent that made EVE look like a game for toddlers. thanks from
togel online